Systematic Review of Multi-Criteria Decision-Making Frameworks
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.59461/ijitra.v5i3.241Keywords:
Multi-Criteria Decision-Making (MCDM) Systematic Review PRISMA AHP and TOPSIS Hybrid MCDM FrameworksAbstract
Multi-criteria decision-making (MCDM) frameworks emerged as essential methods for resolving challenging decision making with wide domain fields such as energy, sustainability, healthcare, transportation, and supply chain management. This systematic review, carried out according to PRISMA principles, explore 92 peer-reviewed articles reported in the period of 2021 and 2026 to implementation of mixed MCDM Frameworks with AHP and TOPSIS continue to be the primarily broadly used individual methods, namely as MEREC, CRITIC, FUCOM, LBWA, and IDOCRIW, have also emerged. Applications increasingly cover healthcare, clean energy, vendor selection, and sustainability.
Subsequent research should prioritize standardized method-selection guidelines, enhance assessment, adaptive decision-making, group decision making, and integration with machine learning
Published
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2026 Abdullahi Mohammed Auna; Dr. Solomon Adelowo Adepoju, Dr. Kehinde Hussein Lawal

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.